× Didn't find what you were looking for? Ask a question
Top Posters
Since Sunday
w
6
P
3
u
3
j
3
s
3
a
3
d
3
p
3
A
3
3
g
3
o
3
Home Q & A Board Humanities Legal Studies
New Topic  
Shardra95w Shardra95w
wrote...
Go to Answer
Posts: 312
Rep: 0 0
6 years ago
In Yim v. J's Fashion Accessories, Inc, where J's Fashion sued Yim for failing to pay for goods he bought under the name Ho Tae and Yim denied liability on the grounds that he had been acting as an agent for Hosung Enterprise, Inc which also did business under the name Ho Tae, the courts held that:
 a. Yim was not liable because he was an agent of Hosung Enterprise, Inc.
  b. Yim was not liable, even though he was an agent of Hosung Enterprise, Inc.
  c. Yim was liable because he never disclosed Hosung Enterprise, Inc. as the principal d. Yim was not liable because he had apparent authority
  e. Yim was liable because he disclosed Hosung Enterprise, Inc. as the principal
Read 73 times
1 Reply
Replies
Answer verified by a subject expert
takirahh_takirahh_
wrote...
#1
Top Poster
Posts: 1146
Rep: 4 0
6 years ago
Sign in or Sign up in seconds to unlock everything for free
1

Related Topics

Shardra95w Author
wrote...

6 years ago
Thanks
choih94
wrote...

Yesterday
Correct Slight Smile TY
Zacellison
wrote...

2 hours ago
Thanks
New Topic      
Quick Reply
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  1352 People Browsing
 114 Signed Up Today
Start New Topic Take the Tour CoursesNew Study Tools Topics Trending Browse by Textbook
Live Chat
Related Images
  
 167
  
 391
  
 317
Your Opinion
Do you believe in global warming?
Votes: 488
Previous poll results: Should Ph.D.'s be addressed as doctors?