× Didn't find what you were looking for? Ask a question
Top Posters
Since Sunday
k
4
4
c
4
M
3
t
3
i
3
B
3
k
3
m
3
c
3
o
3
l
3
New Topic  
s08203010 s08203010
wrote...
Posts: 316
Rep: 0 0
6 years ago
In Yim v. J's Fashion Accessories, Inc, where J's Fashion sued Yim for failing to pay for goods he bought under the name Ho Tae and Yim denied liability on the grounds that he had been acting as an agent for Hosung Enterprise, Inc which also did business under the name Ho Tae, the courts held that:
 a. Yim was not liable because he was an agent of Hosung Enterprise, Inc.
  b. Yim was not liable, even though he was an agent of Hosung Enterprise, Inc. c. Yim was liable because he disclosed Hosung Enterprise, Inc. as the principal d. Yim was not liable because he had apparent authority
  e. none of the other choices are correct
Read 71 times
1 Reply

Related Topics

Replies
wrote...
6 years ago
e
New Topic      
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  814 People Browsing
Related Images
  
 150
  
 133
  
 638
Your Opinion
Who's your favorite biologist?
Votes: 587

Previous poll results: Where do you get your textbooks?