× Didn't find what you were looking for? Ask a question
Top Posters
Since Sunday
L
4
d
4
3
k
3
k
3
j
3
k
3
b
3
f
3
b
3
d
3
h
3
New Topic  
rembrar rembrar
wrote...
Posts: 348
Rep: 0 0
6 years ago
Fraudulent Misrepresentation. In 1987, United Parcel Service Co and United Parcel Service of America, Inc (together known as UPS), decided to change the parcel delivery business from relying on contract carriers to establishing its own airline. During the transition, which took sixteen months, UPS hired 811 pilots. At the time, UPS expressed a desire to hire pilots who remained throughout that period with its contract carriers, which included Orion Air. A UPS representative met with more than fifty Orion pilots and made promises of future employment. John Rickert, a captain with Orion, was one of the pilots. Orion ceased operation after the UPS transition, and UPS did not hire Rickert, who obtained employment about six months later as a second officer with American Airlines, but at a lower salary. Rickert filed a suit in a Kentucky state court against UPS, claiming, in part, fraud based on the promises made by the UPS representative. UPS filed a motion for a directed verdict. What are the elements for a cause of action based on fraudulent misrepresentation? In whose favor should the court rule in this case, and why?
Read 64 times
1 Reply
Replies
Answer verified by a subject expert
PsychHelpPsychHelp
wrote...
Posts: 438
Rep: 2 0
6 years ago
Sign in or Sign up in seconds to unlock everything for free
This verified answer contains over 190 words.
1

Related Topics

rembrar Author
wrote...

6 years ago
Good timing, thanks!
wrote...

Yesterday
Thanks for your help!!
wrote...

2 hours ago
Thanks
New Topic      
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  1009 People Browsing
Related Images
  
 81
  
 275
  
 462