× Didn't find what you were looking for? Ask a question
Top Posters
Since Sunday
w
3
w
3
e
3
3
r
3
b
2
M
2
V
2
f
2
c
2
c
2
K
2
Home Q & A Board Humanities Legal Studies
New Topic  
tfarone1989 tfarone1989
wrote...
Go to Answer
Posts: 337
Rep: 0 0
6 years ago
In In re Polar Bear Endangered Species Act Listing, the listing of the polar bear as a threatened specie was challenged. It is not endangered today but could be in the future. The listing by the Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) was attacked as arbitrary and capricious. The appeals court held that:
 a. courts may not review decisions of the FWS regarding such listings
  b. the listing was proper as FWS explalined its rationale sufficiently
  c. the listing was improper because the FWS failed to show that its survival was in danger unless very strange assumptions were made
  d. the listing was arbitrary and capricious as the FWS failed to justify its decision based on scientific evidence
  e. none of the other choices
Read 89 times
1 Reply
Replies
Answer verified by a subject expert
racheyrachey
wrote...
#1
Top Poster
Posts: 1164
Rep: 1 0
6 years ago
Sign in or Sign up in seconds to unlock everything for free
1

Related Topics

tfarone1989 Author
wrote...

6 years ago
Smart ... Thanks!
7.prime7105
wrote...

Yesterday
Brilliant ツ
shangshang
wrote...

2 hours ago
Helped a lot
New Topic      
Quick Reply
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  578 People Browsing
Start New Topic Take the Tour CoursesNew Study Tools Topics Trending Browse by Textbook
Live Chat
Related Images
  
 244
  
 940
  
 296
Your Opinion
Do you believe in global warming?
Votes: 488
Previous poll results: Do you trust social media networks with protecting your privacy?