× Didn't find what you were looking for? Ask a question
Top Posters
Since Sunday
r
4
L
4
3
d
3
M
3
l
3
V
3
s
3
d
3
a
3
g
3
j
3
Home Q & A Board Other Fields Homework Help Business
New Topic  
ripper ripper
wrote...
Go to Answer
Posts: 611
Rep: 0 0
6 years ago
In In re Polar Bear Endangered Species Act Listing, the listing of the polar bear as a threatened specie was challenged. It is not endangered today but could be in the future. The listing by the Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) was attacked as arbitrary and capricious. The appeals court held that:
 a. courts may not review decisions of the FWS regarding such listings
  b. the listing was proper as FWS showed that the bear is in imminent danger of survival
  c. the listing was improper because the FWS failed to show that its survival was in danger unless very strange assumptions were made
  d. the listing was arbitrary and capricious as the FWS failed to justify its decision based on scientific evidence
  e. none of the other choices
Read 90 times
1 Reply
Replies
Answer verified by a subject expert
MacdonaldcMacdonaldc
wrote...
#1
Top Poster
Posts: 1184
Rep: 8 0
6 years ago
Sign in or Sign up in seconds to unlock everything for free
1

Related Topics

ripper Author
wrote...

6 years ago
Smart ... Thanks!
africa143
wrote...

Yesterday
this is exactly what I needed
Mcb
wrote...

2 hours ago
This helped my grade so much Perfect
New Topic      
Quick Reply
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  1872 People Browsing
Start New Topic Take the Tour CoursesNew Study Tools Topics Trending Browse by Textbook
Live Chat
Related Images
  
 952
  
 1062
  
 270
Your Opinion
What percentage of nature vs. nurture dictates human intelligence?
Votes: 436
Previous poll results: Does a gender wage gap exist in America?