× Didn't find what you were looking for? Ask a question
Top Posters
Since Sunday
t
7
m
6
k
6
F
5
j
5
t
5
j
5
G
5
f
5
a
5
d
5
c
5
Home Q & A Board Humanities Legal Studies
New Topic  
huck4 huck4
wrote...
Go to Answer
Posts: 644
Rep: 0 0
6 years ago
Freedom of Speech. The City of Tacoma, Washington, enacted an ordinance that prohibited the playing of car sound systems at a volume that would be audible at a distance greater than fifty feet. Dwight Holland was arrested and convicted for violating the ordinance. The conviction was later dismissed, but Holland filed a civil suit in a Washington state court against the city. He claimed in part that the ordinance violated his freedom of speech under the First Amendment. On what basis might the court conclude that this ordinance is constitutional? (Hint: In playing a sound system, was Holland actually expressing himself?)
Read 34 times
1 Reply
Replies
Answer verified by a subject expert
syaarsyaar
wrote...
#1
Top Poster
Posts: 1166
Rep: 8 0
6 years ago
Sign in or Sign up in seconds to unlock everything for free
This verified answer contains over 150 words.
1

Related Topics

huck4 Author
wrote...

6 years ago
this is exactly what I needed
veronee_madison
wrote...

Yesterday
Thanks
jayfo05
wrote...

2 hours ago
Smart ... Thanks!
New Topic      
Quick Reply
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  1013 People Browsing
Start New Topic Take the Tour CoursesNew Study Tools Topics Trending Browse by Textbook
Live Chat
Related Images
  
 75
  
 822
  
 317