× Didn't find what you were looking for? Ask a question
Top Posters
Since Sunday
a
5
k
5
c
5
B
5
l
5
C
4
s
4
a
4
t
4
i
4
r
4
r
4
Home Q & A Board Humanities Legal Studies
New Topic  
jmoney123 jmoney123
wrote...
Go to Answer
Posts: 325
Rep: 0 0
6 years ago
In Mazetti v. Armour, a court in 1913 held that a food producer must provide food safe for human consumption, even if there is no privity of contract. Liability was based on:
 a. misrepresentation b. caveat emptor
  c. UCC Section 2-314
  d. implied warranty of safety e. express warranty of safety
Read 45 times
1 Reply
Replies
Answer verified by a subject expert
boopboop
wrote...
#1
Posts: 203
Rep: 2 0
6 years ago
Sign in or Sign up in seconds to unlock everything for free
1

Related Topics

jmoney123 Author
wrote...

6 years ago
Thank you, thank you, thank you!
Starfiew
wrote...

Yesterday
I appreciate what you did here, answered it right Smiling Face with Open Mouth
KaylenePig
wrote...

2 hours ago
Thanks
New Topic      
Quick Reply
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  1350 People Browsing
 109 Signed Up Today
Start New Topic Take the Tour CoursesNew Study Tools Topics Trending Browse by Textbook
Live Chat
Related Images
  
 323
  
 367
  
 14
Your Opinion
What's your favorite math subject?
Votes: 293
Previous poll results: Which is the best fuel for late night cramming?