× Didn't find what you were looking for? Ask a question
Top Posters
Since Sunday
Home Q & A Board Humanities Legal Studies
New Topic  
madmadmad madmadmad
wrote...
Go to Answer
Posts: 615
Rep: 0 0
6 years ago
In Slater Numismatics v. Driving Force, Driving Force was set up by former employees of a firm Slater worked closely with. Driving Force then move to capture business from a major client of Slater. Slater sued for interference with contractual relations. The appeals court held that Slater
 a. presented a strong case for intentional interference as Driving Force appeared to make is hard for Slater to perform its contractual duties
  b. could sue for intentional interference because Driving Force was shown to have profit motives for attempting to take away business
  c. had been defrauded by Driving Force
  d. could not sue Driving Force because it was a matter of hard but honest competition
  e. none of the other choices are correct
Read 106 times
1 Reply
Replies
Answer verified by a subject expert
aaa222555aaa222555
wrote...
#1
Posts: 420
Rep: 1 0
6 years ago
Sign in or Sign up in seconds to unlock everything for free
1

Related Topics

madmadmad Author
wrote...

6 years ago
Correct Slight Smile TY
jblazah
wrote...

Yesterday
Thanks for your help!!
TheMoffattMan
wrote...

2 hours ago
This helped my grade so much Perfect
New Topic      
Quick Reply
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  1257 People Browsing
Start New Topic Take the Tour CoursesNew Study Tools Topics Trending Browse by Textbook
Related Images
  
 311
  
 68
  
 150
Your Opinion
Do you believe in global warming?
Votes: 370
Previous poll results: Who will win the 2024 president election?