× Didn't find what you were looking for? Ask a question
Top Posters
Since Sunday
j
4
m
4
n
3
m
3
R
3
V
3
e
3
w
3
j
3
a
3
a
3
h
3
Home Q & A Board Other Fields Homework Help Business
New Topic  
EdJones95 EdJones95
wrote...
Go to Answer
Posts: 336
Rep: 0 0
6 years ago
In Erichsen v. No-Frills Supermarkets, a woman who was shopping was seriously injured by a robber in the parking lot. She sued the store claiming that its failure to provide adequate security was a breach of its duty to her. The Nebraska high court held that:
 a. the store could be sued for negligence because there was a sufficient amount of criminal activity in the area to warrant warning customers
  b. the store could not be sued for negligence because there was a sufficient amount of criminal activity in the area to warrant warning customers
  c. the store could not be sued for negligence because there was not a sufficient amount of criminal activity in the area to warrant warning customers
  d. the store could not be sued for negligence because Erichsen had a duty to protect herself
  e. the store could not be sued for negligence because the high crime in the area was common knowledge
Read 31 times
1 Reply
Replies
Answer verified by a subject expert
Trejo1426Trejo1426
wrote...
#1
Posts: 230
Rep: 1 0
6 years ago
Sign in or Sign up in seconds to unlock everything for free
1

Related Topics

EdJones95 Author
wrote...

6 years ago
This helped my grade so much Perfect
my life
wrote...

Yesterday
Helped a lot
dianeflunder
wrote...

2 hours ago
Correct Slight Smile TY
New Topic      
Quick Reply
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  913 People Browsing
Start New Topic Take the Tour CoursesNew Study Tools Topics Trending Browse by Textbook
Live Chat
Related Images
  
 187
  
 332
  
 154
Your Opinion
Which is the best fuel for late night cramming?
Votes: 146
Previous poll results: Where do you get your textbooks?