× Didn't find what you were looking for? Ask a question
Top Posters
Since Sunday
y
2
m
2
m
2
u
2
m
2
B
2
M
2
e
2
k
2
N
2
y
2
m
2
Home Q & A Board Humanities Legal Studies
New Topic  
soccer97 soccer97
wrote...
Go to Answer
Posts: 328
Rep: 0 0
6 years ago
In Thayer v. Hollinger, Hollinger owned land next to lakeshore lots that he developed. He shared a common road with the lakeshore lot owners who used trails on his property that were accessed from the road. Hollinger claimed he could block use of the trails. The lot owners claimed an easement to use the trails. The courts held that:
 a. restrictive covenants did not establish easements for the lot owners
  b. restrictive covenants established the right of lot owners to use the trails
  c. easements that ran with the land attach to property that is commonly attached which includes the road and trails
  d. restrictive covenants have no true legal power in Montana
  e. none of the other choices are correct
Read 43 times
1 Reply
Replies
Answer verified by a subject expert
sophiakhalid12sophiakhalid12
wrote...
#1
Top Poster
Posts: 1155
Rep: 4 0
6 years ago
Sign in or Sign up in seconds to unlock everything for free
1

Related Topics

soccer97 Author
wrote...

6 years ago
Good timing, thanks!
Zacellison
wrote...

Yesterday
Thanks
aricketts6@
wrote...

2 hours ago
Smart ... Thanks!
New Topic      
Quick Reply
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  610 People Browsing
Start New Topic Take the Tour CoursesNew Study Tools Topics Trending Browse by Textbook
Live Chat
Related Images
  
 471
  
 898
  
 235
Your Opinion
Do you believe in global warming?
Votes: 488
Previous poll results: What percentage of nature vs. nurture dictates human intelligence?