× Didn't find what you were looking for? Ask a question
Top Posters
Since Sunday
7
6
o
5
b
4
s
3
j
3
b
3
m
3
K
3
g
3
L
3
w
3
Home Q & A Board Humanities Legal Studies
New Topic  
WENLiu WENLiu
wrote...
Go to Answer
Posts: 538
Rep: 0 0
6 years ago
In New York v. Burger, a junkyard owner claimed that a New York statute permitting warrantless searches of junkyards was a violation of the 4th Amendment. The Supreme Court held that the statute was:
 a. constitutional because the Fourth Amendment applies only to real persons, not businesses
  b. constitutional because to hold otherwise would leave the Commerce Clause meaningless when regulation isclearly necessary
 c. unconstitutional because it was applied in a discriminatory manner d. an unconstitutional violation of the exclusionary rule
  e. none of the other choices
Read 62 times
1 Reply
Replies
Answer verified by a subject expert
csaenz4csaenz4
wrote...
#1
Posts: 393
Rep: 1 0
6 years ago
Sign in or Sign up in seconds to unlock everything for free
1

Related Topics

WENLiu Author
wrote...

6 years ago
This site is awesome
jcarter
wrote...

Yesterday
this is exactly what I needed
Morgan-C
wrote...

2 hours ago
Smart ... Thanks!
New Topic      
Quick Reply
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  1063 People Browsing
Start New Topic Take the Tour CoursesNew Study Tools Topics Trending Browse by Textbook
Related Images
  
 171
  
 94
  
 899