× Didn't find what you were looking for? Ask a question
Top Posters
Since Sunday
e
5
e
4
4
d
4
o
3
p
3
t
3
3
m
3
p
3
m
3
f
3
New Topic  
WENLiu WENLiu
wrote...
Posts: 538
Rep: 0 0
6 years ago
On or about April 30, 1993, Kent Van Der Veen murdered his parents, Morris and Deanne Van Der Veen. Kent was 19 years old at the time and had fathered a child two years earlier who had been legally adopted by persons not identified in the court proceedings. Morris and Deanne were not aware of the existence of Kent's child prior to their deaths. Kent Van Der Veen was disqualified from inheriting any portion of his parents' estate under Kansas's slayer statute. Kent's child, the biological grandchild of Morris and Deanne, petitioned to inherit one-half of her biological grandparents' estate. What should the court do about the child's claim?
Read 166 times
2 Replies

Related Topics

Replies
wrote...
6 years ago
The court held that neither the adoption nor the child being the child of the murderer precluded her from inheriting from her biological grandparents. The court noted that the statutes were not designed to result in an escheat of an estate. Here there was a biological heir who had not done anything wrong or violated the slayer statute and was most likely intended by her grandparents to be a beneficiary of their estate.
WENLiu Author
wrote...
6 years ago
Passing because of you
New Topic      
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  1008 People Browsing
Related Images
  
 213
  
 435
  
 449