× Didn't find what you were looking for? Ask a question
Top Posters
Since Sunday
o
5
b
4
4
s
3
j
3
b
3
m
3
K
3
g
3
L
3
w
3
m
3
New Topic  
ruthayak ruthayak
wrote...
Posts: 580
Rep: 0 0
6 years ago
Isidro issued a negotiable promissory note to his attorney in return for the attorney's promise to perform legal services. The attorney never rendered the legal services but quickly negotiated the note to Anna, a holder in due course. Anna and Mark were involved in business negotiations and Anna offered to purchase a car from Mark. She offered as part payment for the car the note issued by Isidro. By coincidence, Mark knew both Isidro and the attorney and the facts concerning the note and the unperformed legal services. Despite this, Mark accepted a negotiation of the note from Anna. Isidro refused to pay the note and Mark eventually sued Isidro to collect. What is the probable outcome?
Read 106 times
2 Replies

Related Topics

Replies
wrote...
6 years ago
Mark knew of the defense of the maker, Isidro. Accordingly, Mark was not a holder in due course. Mark does, however, qualify as a holder through a holder in due course, and will therefore be entitled to collect. Isidro's defense, breach of contract, is a limited defense not available against a party with the rights of a holder in due course.
ruthayak Author
wrote...
6 years ago
 Thinking Face hmm OK, ty
New Topic      
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  1279 People Browsing
Related Images
  
 93
  
 341
  
 319
Your Opinion
Which industry do you think artificial intelligence (AI) will impact the most?
Votes: 405