× Didn't find what you were looking for? Ask a question
Top Posters
Since Sunday
5
a
5
k
5
c
5
B
5
l
5
C
4
s
4
a
4
t
4
i
4
r
4
New Topic  
stewartt08 stewartt08
wrote...
Posts: 534
Rep: 0 0
6 years ago
Martin Kiefaber sold his Arlington, Virginia, home on November 19, 2009. The buyers' real estate agent, Steven Thorman, who was affiliated with RE/MAX Allegiance, assisted the buyers in acquiring a home warranty in connection with that transaction. The buyers requested that Kiefaber cover the cost of the home warranty. Kiefaber agreed and bought a 399 policy from HMS National, Inc that covered the home's appliances for one year. After Kiefaber funded the warranty, HMS paid RE/MAX 60 in connection with Thorman's involvement in the transaction. Kiefaber alleges that the 60 payment to RE/MAX was an illegal kickback for a referral in violation of the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act. Is he correct?
Read 30 times
2 Replies

Related Topics

Replies
wrote...
6 years ago
Court concluded as a matter of law, based on undisputed facts, that HMS paid the 60 fee for compensable services actually performed and that the fee was therefore not a prohibited referral fee. Kiefaber v. HMS Natl. Inc., 2012 WL 3192757 (E.D. Va. 2012).
stewartt08 Author
wrote...
6 years ago
Happy Dummy
New Topic      
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  1250 People Browsing
Related Images
  
 560
  
 901
  
 124
Your Opinion
Do you believe in global warming?
Votes: 370

Previous poll results: Where do you get your textbooks?