× Didn't find what you were looking for? Ask a question
Top Posters
Since Sunday
o
2
2
1
1
Home Q & A Board Humanities Legal Studies
New Topic  
talo_rk talo_rk
wrote...
Go to Answer
Posts: 601
Rep: 0 0
6 years ago
John was driving his car in a careless way, failing to drive as a reasonably prudent person would under the driving conditions. Ramona was crossing the street in a careless way, failing to cross as a reasonably prudent person would. John struck and injured Ramona with the car John was driving. At trial, it was determined that John was 80 percent at fault and that Ramona was 20 percent at fault. The injuries sustained amounted to 100,000. Explain how much, if any, recovery Ramona would receive in a state that applies the contributory negligence rule. Do the same thing for a state that applies the comparative negligence rule.
Read 62 times
1 Reply
Replies
Answer verified by a subject expert
ishgupishgup
wrote...
#1
Top Poster
Posts: 678
Rep: 0 0
6 years ago
Sign in or Sign up in seconds to unlock everything for free
1

Related Topics

talo_rk Author
wrote...

6 years ago
This site is awesome
gma_of_7
wrote...

Yesterday
this is exactly what I needed
Fanmkreyol
wrote...

2 hours ago
Thanks
New Topic      
Quick Reply
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  1041 People Browsing
Start New Topic Take the Tour CoursesNew Study Tools Topics Trending Browse by Textbook
Live Chat
Related Images
  
 227
  
 633
  
 731
Your Opinion
Which country would you like to visit for its food?
Votes: 261
Previous poll results: Which is the best fuel for late night cramming?