× Didn't find what you were looking for? Ask a question
Top Posters
Since Sunday
c
6
r
4
c
3
m
3
h
3
1
3
n
3
s
3
d
3
c
3
a
3
r
3
Home Q & A Board Biology-Related Homework Help Medicine Nursing and Clinical
New Topic  
SpeedPert SpeedPert
wrote...
Posts: 776
Rep: 0 0
6 years ago
One of the feared outcomes of NAFTA was job loss within the United States to the other non-United States partners in NAFTA. The argument against this outcome cited the following advantages:
 
  1. Promotion of economic growth through job creation in the other countries, thus improving health.
  2. Decreasing the spread of communicable diseases due to improved technology.
  3. Developing global health standards.
  4. Improving environmental outcomes.
Read 54 times
1 Reply

Related Topics

Replies
wrote...
#1
6 years ago
Answer: 1
Explanation: 1. Concerns about United States involvement in NAFTA was related to job loss in the United States. Arguments rebutting this cited that NAFTA would increase economic opportunities for other NAFTA partners, thus increasing employment and income, which in turn would create better financial prosperity and improved health outcomes. Global health standards are not a function of the NAFTA globalization and environmental outcomes have not been addressed. Communicable disease spread was not an outcome addressed with NAFTA participation.
New Topic      
Quick Reply
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  1354 People Browsing
Start New Topic Take the Tour CoursesNew Study Tools Topics Trending Browse by Textbook
Live Chat
Related Images
  
 367
  
 690
  
 999
Your Opinion
What's your favorite coffee beverage?
Votes: 303
Previous poll results: Who will win the 2024 president election?