× Didn't find what you were looking for? Ask a question
Top Posters
Since Sunday
7
6
o
5
b
4
s
3
j
3
b
3
m
3
K
3
g
3
L
3
w
3
Home Q & A Board Other Fields Homework Help Other
New Topic  
rutu0309 rutu0309
wrote...
Go to Answer
Posts: 687
Rep: 0 0
6 years ago
Explain why an argument may fail to be valid at the level of the Logic of Statements, but might be discovered to be valid a deeper analytical level
 
  The Logic of Statements is valuable for determining that a certain set of arguments is valid provided that the validity depends on the grammatical relationships between simple statements. But, as we saw in the chapter entitled Valid Inferences, the validity of some arguments depends on relationships among classes of objects and their members, and it gives examples of valid inferences based on relationships between individuals, such as transitivity and reflexivity. The examples in those sections of that chapter would not be valid in the Logic of Statements.
 
  What will be an ideal response
Read 37 times
1 Reply
Replies
Answer verified by a subject expert
Greatshiz55Greatshiz55
wrote...
#1
Top Poster
Posts: 1113
Rep: 3 0
6 years ago
Sign in or Sign up in seconds to unlock everything for free
1

Related Topics

rutu0309 Author
wrote...

6 years ago
Thank you, thank you, thank you!
Zacellison
wrote...

Yesterday
I appreciate what you did here, answered it right Smiling Face with Open Mouth
derya1234
wrote...

2 hours ago
This helped my grade so much Perfect
New Topic      
Quick Reply
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  1030 People Browsing
 105 Signed Up Today
Start New Topic Take the Tour CoursesNew Study Tools Topics Trending Browse by Textbook
Live Chat
Related Images
  
 424
  
 349
  
 171
Your Opinion
What's your favorite funny biology word?
Votes: 336
Previous poll results: Who's your favorite biologist?