× Didn't find what you were looking for? Ask a question
Top Posters
Since Sunday
5
a
5
k
5
c
5
B
5
l
5
C
4
s
4
a
4
t
4
i
4
r
4
Home Q & A Board Humanities Legal Studies
New Topic  
aj20386 aj20386
wrote...
Go to Answer
Posts: 735
Rep: 0 0
6 years ago
In South Dakota v. Opperman (1976), the police conducted an inventory search in which they searched Opperman's car after towing it to an impound lot because it was parked illegally. They found marijuana during a search of the glove compartment. SCOTUS decided that the search of the glove compartment:
 
  a. violated the U.S. Constitution, because it did not use the least intrusive means to secure the drugs.
 b. did not violate the U.S. Constitution, because it was a legitimate inventory search.
 c. violated the U.S. Constitution, because it was conducted on a suspicion that drugs were in Opperman's glove compartment.
  d. did not violate the U.S. Constitution, because drugs were discovered in the glove compartment.
Read 59 times
1 Reply
Replies
Answer verified by a subject expert
rachel.rivera@yrachel.rivera@y
wrote...
#1
Top Poster
Posts: 1011
Rep: 3 0
6 years ago
Sign in or Sign up in seconds to unlock everything for free
1

Related Topics

aj20386 Author
wrote...

6 years ago
Good timing, thanks!
fxinternational
wrote...

Yesterday
I appreciate what you did here, answered it right Smiling Face with Open Mouth
Katey_maree
wrote...

2 hours ago
You make an excellent tutor!
New Topic      
Quick Reply
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  1376 People Browsing
Start New Topic Take the Tour CoursesNew Study Tools Topics Trending Browse by Textbook
Related Images
  
 251
  
 109
  
 463
Your Opinion
How often do you eat-out per week?
Votes: 79
Previous poll results: Which is the best fuel for late night cramming?