× Didn't find what you were looking for? Ask a question
Top Posters
Since Sunday
5
a
5
k
5
c
5
B
5
l
5
C
4
s
4
a
4
t
4
i
4
r
4
Home Q & A Board Humanities Legal Studies
New Topic  
Laney2623 Laney2623
wrote...
Go to Answer
6 years ago
In South Dakota v. Opperman (1976), the police conducted an inventory search in which they searched Opperman's car after towing it to an impound lot because it was parked illegally. They found marijuana during a search of the glove compartment. The Supreme Court decided that the search of the glove comparment:
 
  a. violated the U.S. Constitution.
  b. did not violate the U.S. Constitution because it was a legitimate inventory search.
  c. violated the U.S. Constitution because it was conducted on a suspicion that drugs were in Opperman'sglove compartment.
 d. did not violate the U.S. Constitution because drugs were discovered in the glove compartment.
Read 66 times
1 Reply
Replies
Answer verified by a subject expert
sns3guppysns3guppy
wrote...
#1
Top Poster
Posts: 975
Rep: 5 0
6 years ago
Sign in or Sign up in seconds to unlock everything for free
1

Related Topics

bioc
wrote...

6 years ago
Thanks for your help!!
jasonbourne
wrote...

Yesterday
I appreciate what you did here, answered it right Smiling Face with Open Mouth
spaghetti
wrote...

2 hours ago
Smart ... Thanks!
New Topic      
Quick Reply
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  1393 People Browsing
Start New Topic Take the Tour CoursesNew Study Tools Topics Trending Browse by Textbook
Live Chat
Related Images
  
 347
  
 1121
  
 398