× Didn't find what you were looking for? Ask a question
Top Posters
Since Sunday
s
5
g
5
K
5
o
5
g
5
o
4
k
4
s
4
I
4
k
4
j
4
o
4
Home Q & A Board Humanities Legal Studies
New Topic  
Yvonne98 Yvonne98
wrote...
Go to Answer
Posts: 753
Rep: 0 0
6 years ago
Kyllo v. United States held that using a technological device to explore details of a home that would have been unknowable without physical intrusion is not a search and therefore does not need a search warrant.
 
  a. True
  b. False
  Indicate whether the statement is true or false
Read 41 times
1 Reply
Replies
Answer verified by a subject expert
agollubagollub
wrote...
#1
Top Poster
Posts: 929
Rep: 1 0
6 years ago
Sign in or Sign up in seconds to unlock everything for free
1

Related Topics

Yvonne98 Author
wrote...

6 years ago
Thanks
gage
wrote...

Yesterday
Thanks for your help!!
noodlelicker
wrote...

2 hours ago
Smart ... Thanks!
New Topic      
Quick Reply
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  853 People Browsing
Start New Topic Take the Tour CoursesNew Study Tools Topics Trending Browse by Textbook
Live Chat
Related Images
  
 440
  
 1108
  
 1471
Your Opinion
Which is the best fuel for late night cramming?
Votes: 146
Previous poll results: Who's your favorite biologist?