× Didn't find what you were looking for? Ask a question
Top Posters
Since Sunday
y
2
m
2
m
2
u
2
m
2
B
2
M
2
e
2
k
2
N
2
y
2
m
2
Home Q & A Board Humanities Legal Studies
New Topic  
Naf87 Naf87
wrote...
Go to Answer
Posts: 725
Rep: 0 0
6 years ago
For this evidence to be admissible and not a violation of the exclusionary rule,
 
  a. no search warrant is needed, because of the principle of inevitable discovery.
  b. no search warrant is needed, because it is independent source.
  c. a search warrant would have been needed.
  d. no search warrant is needed, because the actions occurring in the apartment were illegal.
Read 77 times
1 Reply
Replies
Answer verified by a subject expert
slayah92slayah92
wrote...
#1
Top Poster
Posts: 932
Rep: 3 0
6 years ago
Sign in or Sign up in seconds to unlock everything for free
1

Related Topics

Naf87 Author
wrote...

6 years ago
Good timing, thanks!
Morgan-C
wrote...

Yesterday
this is exactly what I needed
sadiewolf
wrote...

2 hours ago
Correct Slight Smile TY
New Topic      
Quick Reply
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  625 People Browsing
Start New Topic Take the Tour CoursesNew Study Tools Topics Trending Browse by Textbook
Live Chat
Related Images
  
 303
  
 81
  
 336
Your Opinion
What percentage of nature vs. nurture dictates human intelligence?
Votes: 437
Previous poll results: What's your favorite coffee beverage?