× Didn't find what you were looking for? Ask a question
Top Posters
Since Sunday
6
y
2
m
2
m
2
u
2
m
2
B
2
M
2
e
2
k
2
N
2
y
2
Home Q & A Board Humanities Legal Studies
New Topic  
brunex16013 brunex16013
wrote...
Go to Answer
Posts: 716
Rep: 0 0
6 years ago
The Supreme Court has ruled that trustworthy statements obtained in violation of the Miranda rule may be used:
 
  a. against a defendant in court.
  b. in place of testimony.
  c. to impeach the credibility of awitness who takes the stand.
  d. to shame a defendant in the newspaper.
Read 48 times
1 Reply
Replies
Answer verified by a subject expert
Alonzoperez1118Alonzoperez1118
wrote...
#1
Top Poster
Posts: 940
Rep: 2 0
6 years ago
Sign in or Sign up in seconds to unlock everything for free
1

Related Topics

brunex16013 Author
wrote...

6 years ago
I appreciate what you did here, answered it right Smiling Face with Open Mouth
paulinaibarra98
wrote...

Yesterday
Thanks
mcraver1
wrote...

2 hours ago
Brilliant ツ
New Topic      
Quick Reply
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  489 People Browsing
Start New Topic Take the Tour CoursesNew Study Tools Topics Trending Browse by Textbook
Live Chat
Related Images
  
 314
  
 227
  
 437
Your Opinion
Previous poll results: Should Ph.D.'s be addressed as doctors?