× Didn't find what you were looking for? Ask a question
Top Posters
Since Sunday
7
e
5
e
4
4
d
4
o
3
p
3
t
3
3
m
3
p
3
m
3
New Topic  
Salmams Salmams
wrote...
Posts: 693
Rep: 0 0
6 years ago
According to the Supreme Court opinion in Herring v. U.S. (2009), involving a search pursuant to an active arrest warrant that was later discovered to have been recalled several months earlier:
 
  a. evidence obtained by officers who honestly believe they are acting lawfully is admissible.
  b. the good faith of officers is irrelevant to the determination whether or not to exclude evidence.
  c. all evidence seized pursuant to a search not based on probable cause must be excluded.
  d. the evidence seized pursuant to the search is admissible if the police acted objectively, in reasonably goodfaith and the error in record keeping was negligent but not reckless
Read 38 times
1 Reply
Replies
Answer verified by a subject expert
fahadrfahadr
wrote...
Top Poster
Posts: 929
Rep: 2 0
6 years ago
Sign in or Sign up in seconds to unlock everything for free
1

Related Topics

Salmams Author
wrote...

6 years ago
Thanks
wrote...

Yesterday
Smart ... Thanks!
wrote...

2 hours ago
This site is awesome
New Topic      
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  918 People Browsing
Related Images
  
 93
  
 561
  
 143
Your Opinion
Which 'study break' activity do you find most distracting?
Votes: 820