× Didn't find what you were looking for? Ask a question
Top Posters
Since Sunday
New Topic  
zc323 zc323
wrote...
Posts: 608
Rep: 0 0
6 years ago
The double jeopardy clause does all but one of the following?
 
  a. Attaches in cases in which different standards of proof apply
  b. Does not apply in parole violation hearings where criminal acts by an individual may be part and parcel of such proceedings, even in those acts for which he/she has been acquitted c. Recognizes the separate sovereigns exception
   d. Provides protection in cases of prosecutorial misconduct



Ethics means principles or accepted rules of conduct for a particular individual or group, as mandated by:
 
  a. Law
  b. Policy
  c. Procedure
  d. All of the above



When used as a criminal defense, involuntary intoxication would be classified as a justification for criminal wrongdoing.
 
  a. True b. False



When police officers are deployed to an area experiencing an increase in crime there is often a decrease in crime. However, if the extra officers leave the area and crime returns it is generally believed that the officers had ________ the crime.
 
  A) solved B) stopped C) removed D) displaced



Discuss when the fruits of the poisonous tree doctrine does not apply.
 
  What will be an ideal response?
Read 32 times
2 Replies

Related Topics

Replies
wrote...
6 years ago
a

- - - - - - - - - - - -

d

- - - - - - - - - - - -

b

- - - - - - - - - - - -

D

- - - - - - - - - - - -

The attenuation or purged taint exception evaluates whether the causal connection between the illegal action and the seizure of evidence is sufficiently attenuated. In that, documentation that the evidence was obtained in a manner unrelated to the illegal activity may be sufficient for admissibility. The good faith exception argues that: (1) the exclusionary rule was designed to deter police misconduct rather than to punish the errors of judges and magistrates; (2) no evidence existed to suggest that judges and magistrates are inclined to ignore or subvert the Fourth Amendment or that lawlessness among these actors requires the application of the extreme sanction of exclusion; and (3) no evidence existed to show that the exclusion of materials gathered would have a significant deterrent effect on the issuing judicial official.
Evidence may be admissible if the state can demonstrate that an independent act by an individual other than law enforcement severed the causal chain of illegality and evidence. Evidence may be admissible if the state can demonstrate that the evidence could have derived from a source removed from the causal link. Evidence may be admissible if the state can demonstrate that the evidence would have been discovered without the illegal act.
zc323 Author
wrote...
6 years ago
Thank you for answering correctly!
New Topic      
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  1302 People Browsing
Related Images
  
 92
  
 1137
  
 15
Your Opinion
Do you believe in global warming?
Votes: 370

Previous poll results: What's your favorite coffee beverage?