Top Posters
Since Sunday
7
6
o
5
b
4
s
3
j
3
b
3
m
3
K
3
g
3
L
3
w
3
New Topic  
rsteel rsteel
wrote...
Posts: 174
Rep: 0 0
A year ago
The sugar industry in Canada is effectively a duopoly with two large firms competing with each other for market share. Suppose the two firms collude and successfully restrict joint output to that of a profit-maximizing monopolist. As a result, they each realize an increase in their profits. Why would this collusive agreement be difficult to sustain?

▸ Because the firm with the lower long-run average costs will be able to capture all sales, driving the second firm out of the market.

▸ Because each firm has an incentive to break the agreement by further restricting output in order to increase the price, thereby increasing their own profits.

▸ Because a non-cooperative outcome is inevitable in which output is further restricted and each firm's profit is reduced.

▸ Because each firm has an incentive to break the agreement by increasing output in order to increase their own profits.
Textbook 
Microeconomics

Microeconomics


Edition: 17th
Author:
Read 32 times
1 Reply
Replies
Answer verified by a subject expert
twogat123twogat123
wrote...
Posts: 124
Rep: 1 0
A year ago
Sign in or Sign up in seconds to unlock everything for free
More solutions for this book are available here
1

Related Topics

rsteel Author
wrote...

A year ago
Thanks
wrote...

Yesterday
I appreciate what you did here, answered it right Smiling Face with Open Mouth
wrote...

2 hours ago
Just got PERFECT on my quiz
New Topic      
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  794 People Browsing
Related Images
  
 1224
  
 970
  
 809
Your Opinion
What percentage of nature vs. nurture dictates human intelligence?
Votes: 436