Top Posters
Since Sunday
5
a
5
k
5
c
5
B
5
l
5
C
4
s
4
a
4
t
4
i
4
r
4
New Topic  
deodeo deodeo
wrote...
Posts: 125
Rep: 0 0
6 months ago

Economists often assert that a person who receives an in-kind transfer payment (from government) has a higher income as a result. But an in-kind transfer is not money income, so what are economists thinking?



They are thinking that an additional in-kind benefit, like more money income, makes a person better off and thus they are equating being better off (in the sense of having more goods and services) with a higher income.



They are thinking that persons who receive in-kind benefits end up selling them, receiving money in exchange.



They are thinking that the individuals who receive the in-kind benefits equate more in-kind benefits with more money income.



They are thinking that individuals who receive in-kind benefits would prefer to receive them over receiving additional money income, so that in-kind benefits are worth at least their monetary value.



none of the above

Textbook 
Economics

Economics


Edition: 12th
Author:
Read 27 times
1 Reply
Replies
Answer verified by a subject expert
keeton1989keeton1989
wrote...
Posts: 129
Rep: 1 0
6 months ago
Sign in or Sign up in seconds to unlock everything for free
More solutions for this book are available here
1

Related Topics

deodeo Author
wrote...

6 months ago
This helped my grade so much Perfect
wrote...

Yesterday
Just got PERFECT on my quiz
wrote...

2 hours ago
Brilliant
New Topic      
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  1339 People Browsing
Related Images
  
 898
  
 968
  
 107