Top Posters
Since Sunday
8
5
z
4
n
4
t
4
3
k
3
x
3
r
3
m
3
j
3
c
3
New Topic  
deodeo deodeo
wrote...
Posts: 139
Rep: 0 0
A year ago

Economists often assert that a person who receives an in-kind transfer payment (from government) has a higher income as a result. But an in-kind transfer is not money income, so what are economists thinking?



They are thinking that an additional in-kind benefit, like more money income, makes a person better off and thus they are equating being better off (in the sense of having more goods and services) with a higher income.



They are thinking that persons who receive in-kind benefits end up selling them, receiving money in exchange.



They are thinking that the individuals who receive the in-kind benefits equate more in-kind benefits with more money income.



They are thinking that individuals who receive in-kind benefits would prefer to receive them over receiving additional money income, so that in-kind benefits are worth at least their monetary value.



none of the above

Textbook 
Economics

Economics


Edition: 12th
Author:
Read 38 times
1 Reply
Replies
Answer verified by a subject expert
keeton1989keeton1989
wrote...
Posts: 143
Rep: 1 0
A year ago
Sign in or Sign up in seconds to unlock everything for free
More solutions for this book are available here
1

Related Topics

deodeo Author
wrote...

A year ago
Thanks
wrote...

Yesterday
Thanks for your help!!
wrote...

2 hours ago
this is exactly what I needed
New Topic      
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  359 People Browsing
 112 Signed Up Today
Related Images
  
 701
  
 904
  
 721
Your Opinion
Where do you get your textbooks?
Votes: 447