× Didn't find what you were looking for? Ask a question
Top Posters
Since Sunday
j
3
s
3
j
2
J
2
e
2
n
2
t
2
d
2
b
2
t
2
J
2
b
2
New Topic  
XP XP
wrote...
2 hours ago
As issues stood, not only have been they persecuting a victim of abuse for having been abused - they weren't even doing it out of a honest if confused zeal to save lots of youngsters. Eric himself believed that the police and CPS did not want to admit that that they had put children in danger by not performing on his evidence towards his uncle and the gang leader: didn't want to admit it to the press and public, actually, and perhaps not even to themselves. In a recent (i.e. late '90s) case, Strathclyde believed that they had found the fingerprint of Shirley McKie, one of their very own policewomen, at a murder-site, although she swore she hadn't been there. Conversely, if the police believed Eric was telling the truth, they need to have checked the pornography for his abusers' prints. Even when it had stated the boys said Eric took the shots that wouldn't, of course, have proved that either it or the boys had been telling the truth.
Read 7 times

Related Topics

New Topic      
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  751 People Browsing
Related Images
  
 1054
  
 434
  
 136
Your Opinion
Which is the best fuel for late night cramming?
Votes: 232