× Didn't find what you were looking for? Ask a question
Top Posters
Since Sunday
c
6
r
4
c
3
m
3
h
3
1
3
n
3
s
3
d
3
c
3
a
3
r
3
New Topic  
colleen colleen
wrote...
Valued Member
Posts: 17076
12 years ago
Reread Jefferson’s quotation on corporations, from “Basic Concepts and Tools,” page 16. Do you believe that corporations should be held liable for any damage that their actions cause, in violation of the precautionary principle? Cite evidence to support your view, recalling that opinions uninformed by evidence are of little value in scientific inquiry.
Read 723 times
1 Reply
Sunshine ☀ ☼

Related Topics

Replies
wrote...
12 years ago
Usually, de facto (if not de jure) corporations are held liable only to the extent that their actions are illegal and cause measurable harm. This means injured parties must prove some dollar injury. This standard (in practice and absent acceptance of the precautionary principle) makes it very difficult to hold corporations liable for environmental degradation. Further complicating the issue is the evolving state of environmental knowledge and regulations. Ironically, this is one reason why many corporations want some tangible set of environmental standards. They argue that it is difficult to plan activities if the standards keep changing.
Biology!
New Topic      
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  1174 People Browsing
Related Images
  
 947
  
 861
  
 20422
Your Opinion
What percentage of nature vs. nurture dictates human intelligence?
Votes: 436