× Didn't find what you were looking for? Ask a question
Top Posters
Since Sunday
o
3
3
G
3
c
3
q
3
m
3
j
3
s
2
b
2
j
2
u
2
j
2
New Topic  
Plerion Plerion
wrote...
Posts: 2
Rep: 0 0
11 years ago
My biology textbook says a "gene need not be a particular locus on a chromosome. The DNA sequence that results in a gene product can be split and be present on one or several chromosomes." I have never found an example of this. Everything else I have read states that a gene is found at a specific locus.
Source  Biology 10 Edition Sylvia Mader
Read 928 times
1 Reply

Related Topics

Replies
Answer rejected by topic starter
wrote...
11 years ago
This definition merely expands on the central dogma of genetics and recognizes that a gene product need not be a protein, and a gene need not be a particular locus on a chromosome. The DNA sequence that results in a gene product can be split and be present on one or several chromosomes. Also, any DNA sequence can result in one or more products.

This definition recognizes that some prokaryotes have RNA genes. In other words, the genetic material need not be DNA. Again, we can view this as a simple expansion of the central dogma of genetics.

The definition does not spell out what is meant by functional product. It would seem, then, that sequences of DNA resulting in regulatory RNAs or proteins could be considered genes.
 Attached file 
You must login or register to gain access to this attachment.
New Topic      
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  1108 People Browsing
Related Images
  
 241
  
 105
  
 105
Your Opinion
Do you believe in global warming?
Votes: 423

Previous poll results: Who's your favorite biologist?