Top Posters
Since Sunday
5
a
5
k
5
c
5
B
5
l
5
C
4
s
4
a
4
t
4
i
4
r
4
New Topic  
victoria1 victoria1
wrote...
Posts: 160
Rep: 0 0
7 years ago
You wake up one morning and find yourself back-to-back in bed with an unconscious violinist—a famous unconscious violinist. (Let’s call him Mr. K.) He has been found to have a fatal kidney ailment, and the Society of Music Lovers has canvassed all the available medical records and found that you alone have the right blood type to help. They have therefore kidnapped you, and last night Mr. K's circulatory system was plugged into yours, so that your kidneys can be used to extract poisons from his blood as well as your own. 
The director of the hospital now tells you, “Look, we're sorry the Society of Music Lovers did this to you—we would never have permitted it if we had known. But still, they did it, and Mr. K is now plugged into you. To unplug you would be to kill him. But never mind, it’s only for nine months. By then he will have recovered from his ailment, and can safely be unplugged from you.” Is it morally incumbent on you to accede to this situation? No doubt it would be very nice of you if you did; it would be a great kindness. But do you have the moral obligation to accede to it? (What if it were not 9 months, but 9 years? Or even longer
Read 223 times
1 Reply
Replies
Answer accepted by topic starter
bio_manbio_man
wrote...
Educator
Top Poster
Posts: 33243
7 years ago
Sign in or Sign up in seconds to unlock everything for free
This verified answer contains over 660 words.
1

Related Topics

New Topic      
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  1390 People Browsing
Related Images
  
 348
  
 271
  
 271
Your Opinion
Who will win the 2024 president election?
Votes: 3
Closes: November 4