× Didn't find what you were looking for? Ask a question
Top Posters
Since Sunday
w
3
w
3
e
3
3
r
3
g
2
2
b
2
M
2
V
2
f
2
c
2
New Topic  
juliejjay juliejjay
wrote...
Posts: 22
Rep: 0 0
12 years ago
I work on power plant turbines for a living and have heard many arguments about not using extensions or Universal joints on torque wrenches when torquing bolts.  I was wondering if there is hard evidence that agrees with or denies this claim.
If this is true, where can I find a table/ chart with the foot lbs. lost by extension?
Read 590 times
2 Replies

Related Topics

Replies
wrote...
12 years ago
You know, occasionally, I've heard claims such as these as well.  But, when you need to use an extension to torque a bolt you have to use it.  Anyway, I've thought about it and the only loss that I could see would be the torsional flexing of the extension taking a portion of the torque you intended for the fastener.

Since the rotational deflection of a shaft (i.e. the extension) is directly proportional to the length of the shaft, then I would recommend using the shortest extension possible.  Also, since the rotational deflection of a shaft is inversely proportional to the shaft diameter raised to the fourth power (i.e. large stiffness change for a small increase in diameter), then I would recommend always using extensions with a diameter greater than the bolt diameter.
wrote...
12 years ago
If you apply torque to one end of a solid shaft, that torque will be transmitted without loss to the other end.  This is because there is no counter-acting force or torque applied anywhere along the shaft (eg, no friction).

The longer the shaft, the more rotational deflection of the shaft will occur, but the torque wrench is impervious to that deflection because it does not use the deflection of the extension shaft to determine torque.  It measures the torque that it applies to its square drive.

U-joints can be a definite problem.  The two-pivot design, when operated at a non-zero angle, causes the rotational displacement, velocity, and torque to fluctuate cyclicly twice per turn.  In automobiles where this would be a problem such as on front-wheel drive vehicles, a constant-velocity joint is used instead of a U-joint.

So yes, a U-joint definitely can cause erroneous readings or tripping of the torque wrench.  Check out the third reference for measured data.

Long shafts should not be a problem.  If a shaft bends sideways at all, it mantains a constant velocity (and hence no torque irregularities) since it is a continuous joint, not a two-pivot joint.

Sloppy square-drive joints on multiple extension shafts might introduce error to the extent that they begin to act like a universal joint.

Note:  Even with U-joints, if you can maintain a straight alignment with the bolt head, the torque error theoretically is zero.
New Topic      
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  491 People Browsing
Related Images
  
 86
  
 373
  
 278
Your Opinion
Which country would you like to visit for its food?
Votes: 263