Top Posters
Since Sunday
w
5
a
3
j
2
a
2
t
2
u
2
r
2
j
2
j
2
l
2
d
2
y
2
New Topic  
Conceptual Conceptual
wrote...
Posts: 1128
Rep: 4 0
7 years ago
Even though the authors point to a number of situational variables that contributed to the destructive obedience of Stanley Milgram’s participants (e.g., normative and informational conformity pressures, conflicting norms), it might still be argued that people have, lurking deep within them, sadistic tendencies that can easily be elicited by situational variables. What experimental findings by Milgram call this “personal attribution” into question?
a.   When participants could choose the level of shock, they administered very low levels.
b.   Violent prisoners administered lower shocks than non-prisoner participants.
c.   There are cultural differences in the amount of shock participants administer.
d.   When the learner was introduced as a minister, participants gave lower shocks.
Textbook 
Social Psychology

Social Psychology


Edition: 8th
Authors:
Read 130 times
1 Reply
Replies
Answer verified by a subject expert
sleepersleeper
wrote...
Top Poster
Posts: 1496
7 years ago
Sign in or Sign up in seconds to unlock everything for free
More solutions for this book are available here
1

Related Topics

Conceptual Author
wrote...

7 years ago
this is exactly what I needed
wrote...

Yesterday
Thanks
wrote...

2 hours ago
Thanks
New Topic      
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  777 People Browsing
 128 Signed Up Today
Related Images
  
 364
  
 734
  
 190