× Didn't find what you were looking for? Ask a question
Top Posters
Since Sunday
5
a
5
k
5
c
5
B
5
l
5
C
4
s
4
a
4
t
4
i
4
r
4
Home Q & A Board Science-Related Homework Help Chemistry (Moderator: Laser_3)
New Topic  
nvmisi nvmisi
wrote...
Posts: 9
Rep: 0 0
11 years ago
because the reactants are constantly regenerated.

Unlike in an irreversible reaction, there will still be some of the limiting reactant left at equilibrium? Is this correct?



Please help me to clarify this point.

Thanks!
Read 2264 times
1 Reply

Related Topics

Replies
wrote...
#1
11 years ago
Well, there still can be a limiting reagent in an equilibrium situation, in the sense that in equilibrium, the amount of one reagent determines the maximum amount of product formed in the reaction - the only difference to a non-reversible reaction being that the amount of product isn't the stoichiometrically possible, but the amount dictated by the position of the equilibrium. You're right in saying that in the equilibrium situation, some of the "limitin" reagent will be left.
New Topic      
Quick Reply
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  1254 People Browsing
Start New Topic Take the Tour CoursesNew Study Tools Topics Trending Browse by Textbook
Live Chat
Related Images
  
 165
  
 246
  
 1166
Your Opinion
Which industry do you think artificial intelligence (AI) will impact the most?
Votes: 352
Previous poll results: Who will win the 2024 president election?