1.What might your corn cob mean with respect to the expected results.? Note that when you combine all the data collected as a class, observed probabilities (from corn cob image) are very close to expected probabilities (calculated using the Punnett squares). This is related to sample size, which is a point that is made during population studies in ecology.
In questions 2 and 3, you analyzed a dihybrid cross of two parents who were heterozygous for both traits using Punnett squares. In questions 7 and 8, you analyzed counted data from a group of kernels of corn. This question deals with these two cases.
How does the corn cob that you analyzed (observed probability) compare with the expected results of a 9:3:3:1 ratio of dihybrid cross with both parents heterozygous in both traits?
2.
Not flaggedFlag question
Question text
Use the information from the previous question.
In questions 2 and 3, you analyzed a dihybrid cross of two parents who were heterozygous for both traits. In questions 7 and 8, you analyzed counted data from a group of kernels of corn. This question deals with these two cases.
Interpret your observed experimental results with the expected results of a dihybrid cross. Why were they similar / different