Top Posters
Since Sunday
7
e
5
e
5
e
4
n
4
4
d
4
K
3
p
3
z
3
C
3
r
3
Home Q & A Board Science-Related Homework Help Physics
New Topic  
leeo2014 leeo2014
wrote...
Go to Answer
Posts: 10
Rep: 0 0
10 years ago
In simple terms, current flow is the movement of electrons along a conductor.  Electrons are small, and even a small current involves millions of electrons.

Now consider inserting a resistance into a conductor. Fewer electrons flow. As the resistance increases, fewer electrons flow. Now picture a current flow equivalent to 1 electron per second.

Whatever that current may be (I'm curious as to what this value would be), if the resistance was increased further, would all current flow stop - as you cannot have a current flow of (say) half an electron. Or can you? Say one electron every 2 seconds? Is there a theoretical minimum, and if so, what is it?

Also, can it be shown in practice? If so, how?
Read 311 times
6 Replies
Replies
wrote...
#1
10 years ago
I have had a few a beers, but this is a good question.  Of course the temp needs to be figured in.  I will save this for tomorrow and hit it with a fresh head!!!
wrote...
#2
10 years ago
You could say that there is a theoretical minimum. Once an object's resistence reaches a certain point, the object no longer efficiently conducts electricity (this point is undetermined, but I think I remember hearing it's somewhere around 1 nanoamp (one millionth of an amp)).

This is why any insulating material -- say wood -- doesn't efficiently conduct electricity (under certain curcumstances with large electric charges --such as with a lightning strike, even insulators can become conductive).

If you heat a conductor to a certain temperature, then it will eventually reach a point where its resistence is too high and no current will flow.

So, yes, there is a theoretical limit. I can't find any sources for you of this in practice.
Answer accepted by topic starter
iki08iki08
wrote...
#3
10 years ago
Sign in or Sign up in seconds to unlock everything for free
This verified answer contains over 150 words.
1

Related Topics

wrote...
#4
10 years ago
The theoretical minimum for a current is ZERO considering that the wire is isolated (no forces that will cause the electrons to fly off from its atom) and the potential along the wire remains constant (voltage difference along the wire = 0). Remember that a voltage drop is what causes an electron to move  from one point to another (we call that current), so if there is no or zero voltage drop an electron will remain in its position.

This will even make more sense if you recall Ohm's law: I=V/R ; I=current, V=voltage and R=resistance

No matter how high R is or if R reaches infinity if V is not zero, there will always be a small value for I.
wrote...
#5
10 years ago
One electron per second would be a current of 1.6 * 10^-19 Amps.  This is a billion-billion times less than your house uses.

I can't think of why there would be a lower limit on current, unless there's some quantum effect that comes into play.  The electrons do not have to actually "strike" some part of the circuit in order to transmit energy (the electric field that surrounds them can be "felt" in other parts of the circuit, so they can "push" on things from relatively far away).

But just how you would manage to generate such a current--and what it could be used for--I can't imagine.
wrote...
#6
10 years ago
since

1 amp = coulomb/ second    =   6.25 E 18 electrons/second
           
1 electrron/ second = 1/(6.25e18) amps
or 1.6e-19 amps
or 1.6e-7 pico amps

This would be considered an insulator not a conductor and the movement of a single charge like that would be considered an electrostatic effect not a current. This  is the sort of thing that happens when one rubs fur on rubber and so on.
New Topic      
Quick Reply
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  953 People Browsing
Start New Topic Take the Tour CoursesNew Study Tools Topics Trending Browse by Textbook
Related Images
  
 5978
  
 269
  
 1449
Your Opinion
Previous poll results: Does a gender wage gap exist in America?