× Didn't find what you were looking for? Ask a question
Top Posters
Since Sunday
e
5
e
4
4
d
4
o
3
p
3
t
3
3
m
3
p
3
m
3
f
3
Home Q & A Board Humanities History Archaeology
New Topic  
Dr.Vista Dr.Vista
wrote...
Go to Answer
Posts: 5237
Rep: 34 0
6 years ago
What was archaeological investigation of the battlefield at Little Bighorn able to conclude about the nature of the battle?
 
  a. Virtually no evidence of formal tactics such as skirmish lines, supporting Indian accounts of chaos and hand-to-hand fighting.
  b. Evidence of abundant skirmish lines, supporting settler accounts of Custer and his men fighting in a calm and controlled manner.
  c. Custer's personal movements could be tracked by the presence of brass cartridges, as he had the only weapon on the battlefield that used them; his movements indicate that he maintained control of the battle until his death.
  d. The battle lasted for days, with control of the battle switching frequently from Custer's army to the Indians, and back again before Custer's troops were finally completely subdued.
  e. Army tactics included skirmish lines, supportive of settler accounts that Custer left the battle early.
Read 56 times
1 Reply
Replies
Answer verified by a subject expert
Evil A.Evil A.
wrote...
#1
Posts: 304
Rep: 21 0
6 years ago
Sign in or Sign up in seconds to unlock everything for free
1

Related Topics

Dr.Vista Author
wrote...

6 years ago
Just got PERFECT on my quiz
logbi
wrote...

Yesterday
Thanks for your help!!
kobbhy
wrote...

2 hours ago
Smart ... Thanks!
New Topic      
Quick Reply
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  941 People Browsing
Start New Topic Take the Tour CoursesNew Study Tools Topics Trending Browse by Textbook
Live Chat
Related Images
  
 1626
  
 55
  
 646
Your Opinion
Which of the following is the best resource to supplement your studies:
Votes: 292
Previous poll results: Which country would you like to visit for its food?