× Didn't find what you were looking for? Ask a question
Top Posters
Since Sunday
s
5
g
5
K
5
o
5
g
5
o
4
k
4
s
4
I
4
k
4
j
4
o
4
New Topic  
tjrwnghks3 tjrwnghks3
wrote...
Posts: 1014
Rep: 0 0
6 years ago
In the Dred Scott case, the Supreme Court ruled in part that
 
  a. Dred Scott was no longer a slave after living in free-soil areas for five years.
  b. as a black slave, Dred Scott was not a citizen and therefore could not legally sue in a federal court.
  c. the three-fifths compromise was unconstitutional.
  d. Congress had no power to ban the international slave trade.
  e. only free blacks had civil rights.
Read 96 times
1 Reply
Replies
Answer verified by a subject expert
haydenpchaydenpc
wrote...
Top Poster
Posts: 1198
Rep: 3 0
6 years ago
Sign in or Sign up in seconds to unlock everything for free
1

Related Topics

tjrwnghks3 Author
wrote...

6 years ago
Thanks
wrote...

Yesterday
Good timing, thanks!
wrote...

2 hours ago
I appreciate what you did here, answered it right Smiling Face with Open Mouth
New Topic      
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  794 People Browsing
Related Images
  
 7840
  
 295
  
 332
Your Opinion
Which is the best fuel for late night cramming?
Votes: 146

Previous poll results: What's your favorite math subject?