× Didn't find what you were looking for? Ask a question
Top Posters
Since Sunday
k
3
r
3
j
3
V
3
l
3
J
2
1
2
n
2
O
2
h
2
d
2
s
2
Home Q & A Board Humanities History
New Topic  
angel1126 angel1126
wrote...
Go to Answer
Posts: 202
Rep: 0 0
6 years ago
Which of the following best summarizes the Supreme Court ruling in the affirmative action case The Regents of the University of California v. Bakke?
 
  A. Race-based quotas are unconstitutional and race cannot be a factor in admissions.
  B. Race cannot be used as a factor in university admissions.
  C. Only non-race-based quotas can be used in university admissions.
  D. Race-based quotas are unconstitutional, but race can be a factor in admissions.
Read 49 times
1 Reply
Replies
Answer verified by a subject expert
claudiawong05claudiawong05
wrote...
#1
Top Poster
Posts: 508
Rep: 0 0
6 years ago
Sign in or Sign up in seconds to unlock everything for free
1

Related Topics

angel1126 Author
wrote...

6 years ago
Correct Slight Smile TY
megan.xo
wrote...

Yesterday
Thank you, thank you, thank you!
homework1
wrote...

2 hours ago
this is exactly what I needed
New Topic      
Quick Reply
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  921 People Browsing
 117 Signed Up Today
Start New Topic Take the Tour CoursesNew Study Tools Topics Trending Browse by Textbook
Live Chat
Related Images
  
 214
  
 720
  
 355
Your Opinion
How often do you eat-out per week?
Votes: 80
Previous poll results: Should Ph.D.'s be addressed as doctors?