Ch08 Family Law.docx

CHAPTER 8: FAMILY LAW TRANSPARENCY MASTERS Family Law Issues Prenuptial Agreements Terminating a Marriage Nullity Divorce/Dissolution Legal Separation Child Custody Child Support McCord v. McCord Spousal Support Separate Property Community Property Quasi-Community Property Value and Division of Property Family Law Court Pleadings Motions Orders Discovery Settlement and Trial Family Law Matters and Unmarried Parties PURPOSE AND SUBSTANTIVE CONTENT This chapter provides a broad overview of family law. Students are introduced to many familiar topics. The material begins with pre-marital agreements and ends with family law issues involving unmarried persons. Emphasis is placed on the role of the legal assistant in a family law practice. CHAPTER OUTLINE Technology Corner Case File 8-1 Introduction 8-2 Prenuptial Agreements 8-3 Terminating a Marriage Nullity Divorce/Dissolution Legal Separation 8-4 Child Custody 8-5 Support Child Support Spousal Support 8-6 Property Concerns Value and Division of Property 8-7 Family Law Court Proceedings The Pleadings Motions and Orders Discovery 8-8 Settlement and Trial 8-9 Family Law Matters and Unmarried Parties Featured Website Chapter Summary Terms to Remember Questions for Review Questions for Analysis Assignments and Projects SKILL BUILDING The assignments, examples, case questions, and projects provide the students the opportunity to continue to develop the following skills: Critical Thinking Legal Analysis Writing Computer CASE SUMMARIES, CASE QUESTIONS, AND SUGGESTED ANSWERS Wages v. Wages, 660 So. 2d 797 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995) (Pg. 161) This family law decision addresses the question of whether the trial court erred when it changed the custody of a child from the mother to the father. When the parents dissolved their marriage, the mother was designated as the primary residential parent and the father was to pay child support. When the mother wanted to relocate out-of-state she requested a modification of the original visitation schedule. The father responded with a request for a change of custody, or in the alternative, that he no longer be required to pay child support. The trial court found that it would be in the “best interest” of the child to be placed into the custody of the father. On appeal, the Court reverses the lower court’s decision. The Appellate Court agreed that the out-of-state move may have constituted a “substantial change in circumstances.” However, there was no evidence to support that it would have been in the child’s “best interest” to be relocated with the father. The reviewing court found that the father did not meet “the evidentiary burden required to change custody in a modification context.” Why did the appellate court reverse the decision of the trial court? Suggested Answer: The Appellate Court found that the father did not meet “the evidentiary burden required to change custody in a modification context.” Explain the facts that brought about the father’s letter to the court? Suggested Answer: The mother was designated as the primary residential parent and the father was to pay child support when the parties ended their marriage. The mother decided to move to from Florida to Kentucky. The original visitation agreement required alternate weekend visitation for the father with his daughter. Because this visitation schedule would be excessively burdensome in light of the mother’s move to Kentucky, she requested a modification of the visitation schedule. The father’s response to the request for modification was the letter to the trial court. McCord v. McCord, 910 P.2d 85 (Colo. App. 1995) (Pg. 163) A mother requested an order modifying child support after the father won an annuity worth $2 million in the State Lottery. At the same time she requested the father be ordered to “pay his share of the child’s unreimbursed medical expenses” and that she be reimbursed for her attorney fees incurred in the motion for modification of child support. The father quit his job after winning the lottery and described himself as “self-employed.” The magistrate increased the father’s child support obligation, ordered him to pay $1,300 of the mother’s attorney fees, and ordered him to pay a portion of the unreimbursed medical. A district court affirmed the magistrate’s findings and order. On appeal the court (1) upheld the medical expenses portion of the order, (2) held that the father’s increased income constituted a change of circumstances warranting modification of his child support obligation, and (3) held that the father was voluntarily unemployed. Explain the “changed circumstances” cited by the appellate court in upholding the ruling of the magistrate. Suggested Answer: The father voluntarily quit work after winning the lottery. “A parent’s child support obligation may be modified upon a showing of changed circumstances that are substantial and continuing.” When the party requesting the modification can show an increase in the obligor’s income that would result in a 10% change in the amount of child support, the court presumes the child’s needs have increased. Write a brief summary of the court’s discussion of the “voluntarily unemployed” issue (Issue III). Suggested Answer: When a parent is “voluntarily unemployed or underemployed, child support must be calculated based on the parent’s potential income.” A parent will not be considered voluntarily unemployed if he or she is mentally or physically incapacitated. Colorado Statutes set forth the standards to be applied if an employed parent is earning less than he or she is capable of earning. ETHICAL CHOICES In a complicated divorce case, both parties have come to a settlement agreement through their attorneys. Your supervising attorney gave you her notes regarding the settlement and told you that the other attorney was preparing the papers. When the settlement papers arrive you review them and note that the other attorney made a substantial error in the spousal support provision. The error is in your client’s favor. You bring this to the attention of your attorney, who tells you not to do anything about it. What do you do? (Pg. 166) Points to Discuss: Is it unethical to allow a mistake like this to continue? Is it a violation of ethics to do something that affects your client in this way? What do you do when your ethics differ from that of your supervising attorney? Is there a duty to be honest and fair in dealing with opposing parties and, if so, would it be a breach not to reveal the problem? Could you notify the other side anonymously? QUESTIONS FOR ANALYSIS 1. State the issues presented to the Court in McCord v. McCord. Suggested Answer: a. Is it error for a court to modify a child support order requiring Father to pay extraordinary medical expenses after Father wins $2 million in a lottery? b. Is it error for a court to modify child support based on Father’s winning of a lottery when no change of circumstances exist for the child? c. Is it error for a court to impute earnings to a Father when the Father quits his job, claiming it was for physical reasons but presenting no evidence to substantiate the claim? 2. Locate and summarize two family law statutes that address the issue of child custody. Provide the title of the code and the section number in your summary. Use Appendix IV to guide you in proper citation format. The index to the code will enable you to go directly to the appropriate statutes. Choose your vocabulary carefully before going to the index, to provide focus on the topic. Answers will vary from state to state. Chapter 8: Family Law True/False Family law deals with legal issues that affect personal relationships. A premarital agreement may help to protect the assets of persons who plan to marry. A divorce is a total dissolving of a marriage. A legal separation asks the court to resolve just the child support and child custody issues. In all family law matters, the court will be most interested in the welfare of the children. Parents do not always have a legal duty to support their children. Spousal support is awarded when people end their marriage. A marital partner has no legal interest in quasi-community property. The petition is the pleading used to initiate a family law action. Not all family law matters concern married persons. Multiple Choice Laws regarding family and personal relationships are generally found in: state statutes the United States Code law reviews encyclopedias dictionaries An annulment proceeding is used to obtain a court declaration that: the marriage is over a legal separation has begun no legal marriage ever existed the marriage is voidable the marriage was illegal A legal separation asks the court to grant the parties something short of a final termination of the marital contract a nullity an annulment a dissolution spousal support In child custody matters the court will look for solutions that are: easy to enforce in the best interest of the child economically sound designed to keep the parents close to their children designed to move the children around as little as possible Which of the following is not a form of child custody? joint legal custody sole physical custody joint physical custody sole legal custody dual custody The court will retain jurisdiction over spousal support nullity issues child support premarital agreements family issues Which of the following is a category of marital property? automobile house community property inheritance business interest The discovery process in family law will not involve: depositions interrogatories request for production and inspection of documents a “complaint” experts Which tasks would a paralegal working in the area of family law not do? draft moving papers calculate child and spousal support amounts set dates and times of depositions perform legal research set fees Once a court determines that a parent-child relationship exists, it must consider: child support spousal support property issues whether restraining orders are needed income and expense situation for each party Answer Key 1. True 2. True 3. True 4. False 5. True 6. False 7. False 8. False 9. True 10. True 1.a 2.c 3.a 4.b 5.e 6.c 7.c 8.d 9.e 10.a