× Didn't find what you were looking for? Ask a question
Top Posters
Since Sunday
s
3
v
3
p
3
m
2
s
2
d
2
N
2
d
2
e
2
s
2
s
2
e
2
Home Q & A Board Other Fields Homework Help Other
New Topic  
Asian101 Asian101
wrote...
Posts: 755
Rep: 0 0
6 years ago

According to the writers at Fortune, insider trading is inevitable. However, if that were true,
  then there wouldnt be laws against it, and insider trading is illegal.


 
  What will be an ideal response?
Read 53 times
1 Reply

Related Topics

Replies
wrote...
#1
6 years ago

ANS:This
passage contains an argument. The issue is whether insider trading is inevitable.
The unstated conclusion is that insider trading is not inevitable. The first premise is that if
insider trading is inevitable, then there wouldn't be laws against it. The second premise is that
there are laws against insider trading.
This argument is a deductive truth-functional argument.
According to the writers at Fortune,  insider trading is inevitable. However,  if that were
true, then there wouldn't be laws against it, and  insider trading is illegal.
 Insider trading is not inevitable.
 +

New Topic      
Quick Reply
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  1212 People Browsing
 111 Signed Up Today
Start New Topic Take the Tour CoursesNew Study Tools Topics Trending Browse by Textbook
Live Chat
Related Images
  
 768
  
 41
  
 910
Your Opinion
Who's your favorite biologist?
Votes: 608
Previous poll results: What percentage of nature vs. nurture dictates human intelligence?