× Didn't find what you were looking for? Ask a question
Top Posters
Since Sunday
j
4
m
4
4
n
3
m
3
R
3
V
3
e
3
w
3
j
3
a
3
a
3
New Topic  
tarifa tarifa
wrote...
Posts: 358
Rep: 0 0
6 years ago
What did the U.S. Supreme Court decide in Gonzales v. Carhart (2007 )?
 
  What will be an ideal response?

Q. 2

A great majority of agency actions are informal.
 
  a. True
  b. False

Q. 3

The modern co-op is patterned after:
 
  A. Joint tenancy with the right of survivorship
   B. General partnership
   C. Corporate stock ownership
   D. Condominium

Q. 4

Each of the following cases involves a dispute surrounding the contract clause EXCEPT:
 
  A) Fletcher v. Peck.
  B) Trustees of Dartmouth College v. Woodward.
  C) Kelo v. City of New London.
  D) Home Building & Loan Association v. Blaisdell.

Q. 5

The desire to bring about the consequences of the act or knowledge with substantial certainty that the consequences will flow from the act defines the element of
 
  a. causation
  b. damages
  c. an act
  d. intent

Q. 6

Jane entered into a lease in which the landlord allows her to stay on a month to month basis. Both Jane and the landlord have the right to terminate the lease at any time. What type of leasehold does Jane most likely have?
 
  A. Periodic tenancy
   B. Tenancy at will
   C. Tenancy by sufferance
   D. Tenancy for years

Q. 7

If a suit is filed before a harm has occurred or before the threat of harm is imminent, the case is said to be ________.
 
  Fill in the blank(s) with correct word

Q. 8

Veronica sells used cars. In order to facilitate the sale of a vintage Mustang convertible on her lot, she turns the car's odometer back from 156,576 miles to 56, 576 miles. Georgia purchases the car for 12,500 believing the car has been driven about a third of the miles that it really has been driven. It does not take long for the car to need expensive service, including new tires and brakes, to Georgia's unpleasant surprise. Has Veronica committed the tort of misrepresentation?
 
  a. No, because she made no false statement of fact because she did not say anything.
  b. No, because the mileage on the car was not a material (important) fact.
  c. No, because Georgia should have had a mechanic examine the car before she bought it.
  d. Yes
Read 54 times
3 Replies

Related Topics

Replies
wrote...
6 years ago
(Answer to #1)  In Gonzales v. Carhart (2007 ), the U.S. Supreme Court examined the federal Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003. Under this Act, Congress outlawed the so-called partial-birth abortions (properly known as intact dilation and evacuation procedures), but did not provide for an exception in cases where the health of the pregnant woman is in jeopardy. In a 54 ruling, the Court concluded the law's failure to include a health exception did not impose, at least based on the facial language of the statute, an undue burden on a woman's right to an abortion. The Court, however, noted that, if a case were presented where the medical science clearly demonstrated that the banned procedure was necessary to preserve a woman's health, the law's applied prohibition would be unconstitutional. But in Carhart, the Court found that such health risks were not clearly demonstrated.

(Answer to #2)  a

(Answer to #3)  C

(Answer to #4)  C

(Answer to #5)  d

(Answer to #6)  B

(Answer to #7)  unripe

(Answer to #8)  d
tarifa Author
wrote...
6 years ago
Dude, you're awesome. I wish I had you as my teacher!
wrote...
6 years ago
Come to the forum always, I'm be around
New Topic      
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  965 People Browsing
Related Images
  
 894
  
 372
  
 326
Your Opinion