× Didn't find what you were looking for? Ask a question
Top Posters
Since Sunday
p
4
h
4
c
4
d
3
3
c
3
t
3
u
3
A
3
B
3
j
3
s
3
Home Q & A Board Humanities Legal Studies
New Topic  
Ptelwa Ptelwa
wrote...
Go to Answer
Posts: 560
Rep: 0 0
6 years ago
In Burlington Industries v. Ellerth, concerning the liability of a firm for discrimination that occurs in the workplace when an employee claimed she was subject to sexual harassment by her supervisor, but never reported the matter to superiors, the Supreme Court held that:
 a. if it was quid pro quo harassment, not hostile work environment, then the firm is liable if the discrimination is proven
  b. if it was hostile work environment, not quid pro quo harassment, then the firm is liable if the discrimination is proven
  c. if it was either hostile work environment or quid pro quo harassment, then the firm is liable if the discrimination is proven
  d. it does not matter whether it was hostile work environment or quid pro quo harassment, the firm is likely to be vicariously liable if it did not have an effective anti-harassment policy
  e. none of the other choices
Read 35 times
1 Reply
Replies
Answer verified by a subject expert
kvilla5kvilla5
wrote...
#1
Posts: 234
Rep: 0 0
6 years ago
Sign in or Sign up in seconds to unlock everything for free
1

Related Topics

Ptelwa Author
wrote...

6 years ago
You make an excellent tutor!
vernonb
wrote...

Yesterday
Thanks for your help!!
noodlelicker
wrote...

2 hours ago
Thanks
New Topic      
Quick Reply
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  1155 People Browsing
Start New Topic Take the Tour CoursesNew Study Tools Topics Trending Browse by Textbook
Live Chat
Related Images
  
 341
  
 283
  
 5922
Your Opinion
Do you believe in global warming?
Votes: 423
Previous poll results: What's your favorite funny biology word?