× Didn't find what you were looking for? Ask a question
Top Posters
Since Sunday
c
6
r
4
c
3
m
3
h
3
1
3
n
3
s
3
d
3
c
3
a
3
r
3
Home Q & A Board Humanities Legal Studies
New Topic  
Ptelwa Ptelwa
wrote...
Go to Answer
Posts: 560
Rep: 0 0
6 years ago
In Burlington Industries v. Ellerth, concerning the liability of a firm for discrimination that occurs in the workplace when an employee claimed she was subject to sexual harassment by her supervisor, but never reported the matter to superiors, the Supreme Court held that:
 a. if it was quid pro quo harassment, not hostile work environment, then the firm is liable if the discrimination is proven
  b. if it was hostile work environment, not quid pro quo harassment, then the firm is liable if the discrimination is proven
  c. if it was either hostile work environment or quid pro quo harassment, then the firm is liable if the discrimination is proven
  d. it does not matter whether it was hostile work environment or quid pro quo harassment, the firm is likely to be vicariously liable if it did not have an effective anti-harassment policy
  e. none of the other choices
Read 41 times
1 Reply
Replies
Answer verified by a subject expert
kvilla5kvilla5
wrote...
#1
Posts: 234
Rep: 0 0
6 years ago
Sign in or Sign up in seconds to unlock everything for free
1

Related Topics

Ptelwa Author
wrote...

6 years ago
Good timing, thanks!
annielin111
wrote...

Yesterday
Helped a lot
MAry1395
wrote...

2 hours ago
I appreciate what you did here, answered it right Smiling Face with Open Mouth
New Topic      
Quick Reply
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  1447 People Browsing
Start New Topic Take the Tour CoursesNew Study Tools Topics Trending Browse by Textbook
Live Chat
Related Images
  
 737
  
 238
  
 290
Your Opinion
Which industry do you think artificial intelligence (AI) will impact the most?
Votes: 484
Previous poll results: Does a gender wage gap exist in America?