× Didn't find what you were looking for? Ask a question
Top Posters
Since Sunday
w
3
w
3
e
3
3
r
3
g
2
2
b
2
M
2
V
2
f
2
c
2
Home Q & A Board Science-Related Homework Help Psychology
New Topic  
qPaladin qPaladin
wrote...
Posts: 37
Rep: 2 0
11 years ago
Suppose one investigator is to assess each patient for a diagnosis of a given disorder. What is the problem of using one investigator, rather than a randomly selected investigator each time for assessing each patient?

Read 1031 times
2 Replies

Related Topics

Replies
wrote...
#1
11 years ago
A second opinion doesn't hurt, especially when genetic disorders have ambiguous or similar phenotype characteristics to other disorders. Undecided
wrote...
#2
11 years ago
If every patient was assessed by the same investigator, then all of the documentation and diagnoses will have a certain set of biases that the single investigator has, which would not be the case if there was a random investigator assigned each time.
New Topic      
Quick Reply
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  1138 People Browsing
Start New Topic Take the Tour CoursesNew Study Tools Topics Trending Browse by Textbook
Live Chat
Related Images
  
 650
  
 998
  
 721
Your Opinion
Who's your favorite biologist?
Votes: 608
Previous poll results: Do you trust social media networks with protecting your privacy?