× Didn't find what you were looking for? Ask a question
Top Posters
Since Sunday
o
5
5
b
4
s
3
j
3
b
3
m
3
K
3
g
3
L
3
w
3
m
3
New Topic  
campbell25 campbell25
wrote...
Posts: 598
Rep: 0 0
6 years ago
In Cooper v. Oklahoma (1996) the Supreme Court ruled that
 
  A. clear and convincing evidence of incompetence was too high a standard of proof.
  B. clear and convincing evidence of incompetence was the required standard of proof.
  C. a preponderance of the evidence indicating incompetence was too low a standard of proof.
  D. a preponderance of the evidence indicating incompetence was the required standard of proof.
Read 47 times
1 Reply
Replies
Answer verified by a subject expert
skeenan42skeenan42
wrote...
Top Poster
Posts: 724
Rep: 5 0
6 years ago
Sign in or Sign up in seconds to unlock everything for free
1

Related Topics

campbell25 Author
wrote...

6 years ago
I appreciate what you did here, answered it right Smiling Face with Open Mouth
wrote...

Yesterday
Correct Slight Smile TY
wrote...

2 hours ago
Good timing, thanks!
New Topic      
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  1013 People Browsing
 110 Signed Up Today
Related Images
  
 882
  
 1110
  
 1208
Your Opinion
What's your favorite math subject?
Votes: 315