Top Posters
Since Sunday
w
5
a
3
j
2
a
2
t
2
u
2
r
2
j
2
j
2
l
2
d
2
y
2
New Topic  
Actiffed Actiffed
wrote...
Posts: 1578
Rep: 2 0
7 years ago
In Bush v. Hera (1996) and Shaw v. Hunt (1996) the Supreme Court
A) ruled that convoluted majority-minority districts that abandon compact district lines constitute constitutional racial gerrymandering if they result in the election of more African Americans to office.
B) held that majority-minority districts were essential to the election of African Americans.
C) ruled that convoluted majority-minority districts that abandon compact district lines constitute unconstitutional racial gerrymandering.
D) ruled that race took precedence over geographical compactness in drawing district lines.
E) reaffirmed the constitutionality of using race as the predominant factor in drawing district lines.
Textbook 
Government in America: People, Politics, and Policy

Government in America: People, Politics, and Policy


Edition: 14th
Authors:
Read 171 times
2 Replies
Replies
Answer verified by a subject expert
NextiveNextive
wrote...
Top Poster
Posts: 834
7 years ago
Sign in or Sign up in seconds to unlock everything for free
More solutions for this book are available here
1

Related Topics

Actiffed Author
wrote...
7 years ago
WOW, answered so quickly too
New Topic      
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  1041 People Browsing
Related Images
  
 334
  
 329
  
 631
Your Opinion
Who will win the 2024 president election?
Votes: 119
Closes: November 4