Top Posters
Since Sunday
a
5
k
5
c
5
B
5
l
5
C
4
s
4
a
4
t
4
i
4
r
4
r
4
New Topic  
ryobu ryobu
wrote...
Posts: 2240
Rep: 2 0
8 years ago
In 2008 in Boumediene v. Bush, the Supreme Court ruled that
A) foreign terrorism suspects held at Guantanamo Bay have constitutional rights to challenge their detention in U.S. courts.
B) National Security Agency domestic spying and wiretapping of international telephone calls without court-approved warrants were constitutional.
C) The USA PATRIOT Act was unconstitutional.
D) foreign terrorism suspects held at Guantanamo Bay do not have any constitutional right to challenge their detention in U.S. courts.
E) National Security Agency domestic spying and wiretapping of international telephone calls without court-approved warrants were unconstitutional.
Textbook 
Government in America: People, Politics, and Policy

Government in America: People, Politics, and Policy


Edition: 15th
Authors:
Read 159 times
3 Replies
- Enrolled in an AP law course
Replies
Answer verified by a subject expert
tugalugatugaluga
wrote...
Top Poster
Posts: 2100
8 years ago
Sign in or Sign up in seconds to unlock everything for free
More solutions for this book are available here
1

Related Topics

ryobu Author
wrote...
8 years ago
Thank you for responding, I appreciate the help. Vote with confidence people!
- Enrolled in an AP law course
wrote...
8 years ago
You're welcome!
New Topic      
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  1325 People Browsing
 110 Signed Up Today
Related Images
  
 647
  
 948
  
 4428
Your Opinion
What percentage of nature vs. nurture dictates human intelligence?
Votes: 431

Previous poll results: What's your favorite math subject?