Top Posters
Since Sunday
y
2
m
2
m
2
u
2
m
2
B
2
M
2
e
2
k
2
N
2
y
2
m
2
Home Q & A Board Humanities Legal Studies
New Topic  
ryobu ryobu
wrote...
Go to Answer
Posts: 2240
Rep: 2 0
9 years ago
In 2008 in Boumediene v. Bush, the Supreme Court ruled that
A) foreign terrorism suspects held at Guantanamo Bay have constitutional rights to challenge their detention in U.S. courts.
B) National Security Agency domestic spying and wiretapping of international telephone calls without court-approved warrants were constitutional.
C) The USA PATRIOT Act was unconstitutional.
D) foreign terrorism suspects held at Guantanamo Bay do not have any constitutional right to challenge their detention in U.S. courts.
E) National Security Agency domestic spying and wiretapping of international telephone calls without court-approved warrants were unconstitutional.
Textbook 
Government in America: People, Politics, and Policy

Government in America: People, Politics, and Policy


Edition: 15th
Authors:
Read 188 times
3 Replies
- Enrolled in an AP law course
Replies
Answer verified by a subject expert
tugalugatugaluga
wrote...
#1
Top Poster
Posts: 2100
Rep: 36 0
9 years ago
Sign in or Sign up in seconds to unlock everything for free
More solutions for this book are available here
1

Related Topics

ryobu Author
wrote...
#2
9 years ago
Thank you for responding, I appreciate the help. Vote with confidence people!
- Enrolled in an AP law course
wrote...
#3
9 years ago
You're welcome!
New Topic      
Quick Reply
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  522 People Browsing
Start New Topic Take the Tour CoursesNew Study Tools Topics Trending Browse by Textbook
Live Chat
Related Images
  
 630
  
 167
  
 357
Your Opinion
Who's your favorite biologist?
Votes: 608
Previous poll results: Do you believe in global warming?