× Didn't find what you were looking for? Ask a question
Top Posters
Since Sunday
1
New Topic  
tatianaksmith tatianaksmith
wrote...
Posts: 596
Rep: 0 0
6 years ago
Recall that in a study by Baron et al. (1996), participants in one condition were asked to select perpetrators after a lineup in conditions of low ambiguity,
 
  so that participants in the control condition made very few mistakes. Recall also that some participants were told that the task was one that was being designed for use by the police department and were offered 20 if they were the most accurate, while others were told that it was just a laboratory task under development. This condition of the study found that
  a. the more important it was to participants to be correct, the more they conformed to other group members' answers.
  b. the more important it was to participants to be correct, the less they conformed to other group members' answers.
  c. people conformed more when the pressures were for normative rather than informational influence.
  d. when importance was high and ambiguity was low, conformity virtually disappeared.
Read 81 times
1 Reply
Replies
Answer verified by a subject expert
remyma1212remyma1212
wrote...
Top Poster
Posts: 736
Rep: 5 0
6 years ago
Sign in or Sign up in seconds to unlock everything for free
1

Related Topics

tatianaksmith Author
wrote...

6 years ago
Helped a lot
wrote...

Yesterday
This helped my grade so much Perfect
wrote...

2 hours ago
I appreciate what you did here, answered it right Smiling Face with Open Mouth
New Topic      
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  849 People Browsing
Related Images
  
 1457
  
 6609
  
 1147
Your Opinion
What percentage of nature vs. nurture dictates human intelligence?
Votes: 437

Previous poll results: Who's your favorite biologist?