Top Posters
Since Sunday
I
3
p
2
w
2
y
2
J
2
Q
2
r
2
o
2
e
2
j
2
d
2
T
2
New Topic  
Desolo Desolo
wrote...
Posts: 11831
10 years ago
Martin wins a car in a lottery. As he already owns a car, he decides to sell the new one to his friend Ted. While driving the car, Ted gets into a head-on collision with another car. Due to a defective Supplemental Restraint System (SRS) of the vehicle, the airbag does not deploy and Ted is seriously injured. Which of the following statements is true of this situation?
A) Martin can be held strictly liable because he sold the car to Ted.
B) The car manufacturer cannot be held strictly liable as Ted had not bought the car from them.
C) Martin cannot be held strictly liable as the sale of the car counts as a casual transaction.
D) The driver of the other car can be held strictly liable due to his or her involvement in the accident.

This is for my business law class, anything will help
Read 2432 times
4 Replies
Replies
Answer accepted by topic starter
bbbbbb
wrote...
Top Poster
Posts: 4797
10 years ago
Sign in or Sign up in seconds to unlock everything for free
jevgenija33

Related Topics

Desolo Author
wrote...
10 years ago
Thank again, best homework help forum on the internet.
bbb
wrote...
10 years ago
Great! Here to help.
wrote...
4 years ago
Thanks!
New Topic      
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  1637 People Browsing
Related Images
  
 4523
  
 732
  
 1055
Your Opinion
Which country would you like to visit for its food?
Votes: 264

Previous poll results: What's your favorite math subject?